Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add filters








Language
Year range
1.
Rev. chil. urol ; 79(2): 56-60, 2014. tab, graf
Article in Spanish | LILACS | ID: lil-785344

ABSTRACT

Evaluar pacientes con puntaje de Gleason de 7 sometidos a Prostatectomía Radical (PR) y determinar factores predictores de sobrevida libre de recidiva bioquímica (SL-RB). MATERIALES Y MÉTODOS: Se analizó una cohorte histórica de 1059 pacientes con Cáncer de Próstata sometidos a PR entre 1999 y 2012, de los cuales 490 cumplieron criterios de inclusión. Se definió como recidiva bioquímica (RB) un APE >0,2 ng/ml. Se consideró significativo un valor p < 0.05. RESULTADOS: La edad promedio y mediana de APE preoperatorio fue de 63 años y 6.6 ng/ml, respectivamente. Se observó RB en el 19,8 por ciento de esta serie con una mediana de seguimiento de 49 meses. El análisis multivariado demostró que los márgenes quirúrgicos (MQ) positivos (HR 1,76, p=0,01), T patológico (pT2 versus pT3, HR 2,0, p=0,007) y el porcentaje de cáncer en la pieza operatoria (HR 1,01, p=0,002) son predictores de SL-RB. El Gleason primario (3+4 versus 4+3) no fue un predictor de SL-RB (p=0,29). CONCLUSIONES: El Gleason primario no es un factor relevante para predecir RB en pacientes con GS 7 patológico. Sin embargo, los MQ positivos, el porcentaje de cáncer en la pieza operatoria, APE preoperatorio y la presencia pT3 son factores predictores de RB en pacientes con GS 7 y por lo tanto a considerar para decidir terapia adyuvante.


To evaluate patients with Gleason score 7 who underwent radical prostatectomy (RP) and to determine predictors of biochemical recurrence-free survival (SL-RB). MATERIALS AND METHODS: A historical cohort of 1059 patients with prostate cancer who underwent RP between 1999 and 2012, of which 490 met the inclusion criteria were analyzed. Biochemical recurrence (BR) was defined as a PSA > 0.2 ng / ml. A value of p < 0.05 was considered significant. RESULTS: Mean age was 63y-o and median preoperative PSA and 6.6 ng / ml. RB was observed in 19.8 percent of this series, with a median follow up of 49 months. Multivariate analysis showed that positive surgical margins (MQ) (HR 1.76, p = 0.01), pathological T (pT2 versus pT3, HR 2.0, p = 0.007) and the percentage of cancer in the surgical specimen (HR 1.01, p = 0.002) were predictors of SL-RB. Primary Gleason (3 +4 versus 4 +3) was not a predictor of SL-RB (p = 0.29). CONCLUSIONS: Primary Gleason is not relevant for predicting biochemical recurrence (RB) in patients with GS 7 pathological factor. However, positive margins, percentage of cancer in the surgical specimen, preoperative PSA and the presence pT3 are predictors of RB in patients with GS 7 and therefore they must be considered to decide for adjuvant therapy.


Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Prostatic Neoplasms/surgery , Prostatectomy/methods , Multivariate Analysis , Neoplasm Staging , Follow-Up Studies , Forecasting , Recurrence , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local , Disease-Free Survival
2.
Rev. chil. urol ; 79(1): 45-50, 2014.
Article in Spanish | LILACS | ID: lil-783418

ABSTRACT

La nefrolitotomía percutánea (NLPC) es el procedimiento de elección para buena parte de la litiasis renal. Si bien es un procedimiento seguro, con bajas tasas de complicaciones graves, la ocurrencia de complicaciones menores no es inhabitual. Pese a esto, no existe una forma establecida ni adecuadamente difundida de categorizar y manejar las complicaciones asociadas a la NLPC. Nuestro objetivo es realizar una revisión de este tema, centrándonos en la manera de clasificar las complicaciones, identificar factores de riesgo y probabilidad de desarrollar complicaciones, prevención de éstas y finalmente, referirnos de manera somera al tratamiento...


Percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) is the procedure of choice for most of the kidney stones. While it is a safe procedure, with low rates of serious complications, the occurrence of minor complications is not unusual. Despite this, there is no established and disseminated system to, properly, categorize and manage complications associated with this procedure. Our goal is to review this issue, focusing on how to classify complications, identify risk factors and probability of complications, prevention of these and ultimately refer them briefly to treatment....


Subject(s)
Humans , Kidney Calculi/surgery , Nephrostomy, Percutaneous/adverse effects , Postoperative Complications , Risk Factors
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL